Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dennis v. Magic City Dodge, Inc.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 1, 1988No. 86-922Published

1Concurrence

I concur in the result. Because my reasons for reversing this summary judgment as to the contract claim against Magic City Dodge are at variance with those set forth in the majority opinion, I take this opportunity to set forth my reasons.

In her complaint, Mrs. Dennis alleged that her late husband, Andrew J. Dennis, had prostate cancer; that because of his illness, he had difficulty getting in and out of the cab of his small pickup truck; that he went to Magic City Dodge to buy a new, larger pickup truck; and that he selected a truck and made arrangements for financing. Mrs. Dennis alleged…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Klebanow v. New York Produce ExchangeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. Alabama Power Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Espalla v. Richard & SonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. City Loan & Banking Co. v. PooleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  5. Coburn v. ColemanDistrict Court, W.D. South Carolina · 1947

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API