Legal Opinion

Frank v. City of Decatur

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1910No. 21,667PublishedCited by 7 opinions

From Adams Circuit Court; James T. Merryman, Judge. Action by Samuel Frank against the City of Decatur. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMyers, J.

The city of Decatur is a city of the fifth class, organized under the general law as it existed prior to the passage of the general law of 1905 (Acts 1905 p. 219) concerning' municipal corporations. Prior to the time said act went into effect, an ordinance had been enacted by the common council of the city of Decatur authorizing the mayor to appoint and to remove special policemen. Under that au*390thority appellant was appointed by the mayor prior to March, 1905, and continued under that appointment and was paid by the city until September 30, 1907. He filed a complaint setting up the foregoing…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. State v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  2. Pomeroy v. BeachIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Mayor of Baltimore v. ScharfCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1880
  4. Wright v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Thomas v. Town of ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Logansport v. Public Service CommissionIndiana Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State ex rel. Shea v. BillheimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  3. State Ex Rel. Shanks v. Com. Council, City of Wash.Indiana Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Bissell Chilled Plow Works v. South Bend Manufacturing Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Penn American Plate Glass Co. v. SchwinnIndiana Supreme Court · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API