Legal Opinion

McDaniels v. Perkins

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 12, 1884PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Oass District Oov/rt. Action in equity to set aside certain conveyances of real estate. There was a decree for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.

The plaintiff is a judgment creditor of the defendant, E. G-. Perkins. As such he brings this action to set aside certain conveyances of real estate made by the debtor to his son, the defendant, D. M. Perkins. The plaintiff alleged that the conveyances were made for the purpose of defrauding the grantor’s creditors. The members of this court have all' read the evidence separately, and have reached the conclusion that the plaintiff’s allegations are sustained. While no one fact is proved which, taken by itself, would necessarily show fraud, yet we cannot divest ourselves of the impression that…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wimberly v. WinstockSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Brooks v. GarnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  3. Platt v. SchreyerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API