Legal Opinion

Robin v. Binion

District Court, W.D. Louisiana

Decided January 4, 2007No. Civil Action 04-1695PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM RULING

HICKS, District Judge.

Before the Court is a Motion for Summary Judgment (Record Document 314) filed by Defendants, Jack B. Binion (“Bin-ion”), Horseshoe Entertainment, L.P., Horseshoe Gaming Holding Corporation, and New Gaming Capital Partnership, Inc. Defendants move for summary judgment dismissing all of Plaintiffs’ claims on the grounds that there is no genuine issue of material fact and that they are entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. See id. Both Plaintiff August “Duke” Robin (“Robin”) and the Piper Plaintiffs oppose the Motion for Summary Judgment. See…

2Cases cited27 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
Wallace v. Texas Tech Univ.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
S.W.S. Erectors, Inc. v. Infax, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Pilgrim v. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2009