Legal Opinion

Railway Co. v. Mossman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1891PublishedCited by 12 opinions

PROM HENRY. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Henry County. V. H. Swiggart, ,T.

1Opinion of the CourtLurton, J.

Mossman owns a body of land adjoining tlie right of way of plaintiff in error. Iiis lands lie upon a slightly higher level than the company’s right of way or the lands upon the opposite side of the railroad. There is evidence showing that, but for the embankment constructed and maintained by the railway company, waters falling upon Mossman’s land as rain or snow, or flowing upon his lands from those at a still higher level, would naturally run off' across the railway, and thence upon lower lands beyond, and finally to a small branch. By tlie construction of this railway ■ embankment, and its…

2Cited by12 opinions

  1. Savannah, Americus & Montgomery Railway v. BufordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1894
  2. Davis v. Louisville & N. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Hord v. Holston River RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Fite v. GassawayCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API