Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Knappe

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dawson County. Hon. Frank B. Smith, Judge. Consolidated actions by S. J. Johnson against Carl Knappe and against Gottlieb Metzger and another. From decrees for defendants and orders denying a new trial, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWhiting, J.

The facts in these two cases being the same in so far as material to the issues therein, they were) by stipulation of the parties and consent of the trial court, submitted together, and are likewise so submitted upon this appeal. These actions wfere brought to determine adverse claims to two pieces of real estate; both parties in each action claiming from the same common source — the plaintiff -through a deed, and -the defendants through the foreclosure of a mortgage, which mortgage was given by plaintiff’s grantor prior to the deed to plaintiff. The actions were tried to the court without a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Trice v. ComstockCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  2. Matter of Will of O'HaraNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. People ex rel. Plugger v. Township Board of OverysselMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  4. Burtis Ringo v. Charles BinnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1836
  5. Jansen v. WilliamsNebraska Supreme Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lucey v. VilhauerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Morgan Plan Co. v. VellianitisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Robertson v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Loveland v. PerritonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Boyce v. BoyceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API