Teamsters, Chauffers, Warehousemen & Helpers, Local No. 45 v. Cascade County School District No. 1
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Haswell
This appeal is from a declaratory judgment in the district court of Cascade County, declaring that the members of plaintiff’s union and intervener’s association are not entitled as a matter of right to the vacation benefits enumerated in section 59-1001, R.C.M. 1947.
This action was submitted to the district court on an agreed statement of facts. Plaintiff’s members and intervener’s members are employed by defendant Cascade County School District No. 1 on a full time basis in nonteaching capacities. These employees receive vacation benefits under administrative regulations of the school…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dunphy v. Anaconda CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1968
- State Ex Rel. City of Missoula v. HolmesMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Butte & Superior Mining Co. v. McIntyreMontana Supreme Court · 1924
- State Ex Rel. School District No. 29 v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. FultonMontana Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Duffy v. BUTTE TEACHERS'UNION, NUMBER 332Montana Supreme Court · 1975
- Talley v. Flathead Valley Community CollegeMontana Supreme Court · 1993
- Montana Power Co. v. CremerMontana Supreme Court · 1979
- Vita-Rich Dairy, Inc. v. Department of Business RegulationMontana Supreme Court · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Barnes v. Town of BelgradeMontana Supreme Court · 1974
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.