Legal Opinion

Collingsworth v. King

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 3, 1955No. 12806PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of M. D. King, III, the holder of two vendor’s lien notes, which were assumed and owed by Wayne A. Collings-worth. The judgment was for $24,173.74, which the court determined was the amount owing on notes Nos. Three and Four of a series of notes. Appellant Collingsworth asserts that when the notes were presented, he tendered the holder the correct amount of principal and interest owing on them, and that the trial court erred in charging him with interest and attorney’s fees thereafter. The holder, under a misinterpretation of the notes,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Henderson v. WillisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1925
  2. Appeals of the Forest Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  3. O'Connor v. Kirby Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Rutherford v. McGeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Kullman v. GreenebaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Collingsworth v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Cecil v. Farmers Nat. BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  3. Platsis v. DiafokerisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API