Legal Opinion

Jean v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 25, 2001No. 3D99-1463PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Lizert Jean appeals his convictions for sexual battery, armed robbery, burglary, and aggravated battery. We affirm.

Defendant-appellant Jean contends that the trial court impermissibly limited his cross examination of prosecution witness Edison Hernandez. Hernandez was a co-defendant in this case. He entered into a plea agreement with the State whereby he testified against defendant in exchange for a reduced sentence in this case and an unrelated home invasion robbery, circuit court case number 98-2046.

The trial court allowed defendant to cross examine Hernandez regarding the terms of the plea…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  3. Hutchins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. Simeon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peak v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
  2. White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  3. Burrough v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. Albury v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API