Jean v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
Lizert Jean appeals his convictions for sexual battery, armed robbery, burglary, and aggravated battery. We affirm.
Defendant-appellant Jean contends that the trial court impermissibly limited his cross examination of prosecution witness Edison Hernandez. Hernandez was a co-defendant in this case. He entered into a plea agreement with the State whereby he testified against defendant in exchange for a reduced sentence in this case and an unrelated home invasion robbery, circuit court case number 98-2046.
The trial court allowed defendant to cross examine Hernandez regarding the terms of the plea…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Steinhorst v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1982
- Sullivan v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
- Hutchins v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
- Simeon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
3Cited by4 opinions
- Peak v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2012
- White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
- Burrough v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Albury v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003