Legal Opinion

Walter Oil & Gas Corp. v. Teekay Shipping

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided May 30, 2003No. G-03-008PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT SKAUGEN PETRO-TRANS, INC.’S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE, DENYING SKAUGEN PETROTRANS, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT, DENYING SKAUGEN PETROTRANS, INC.’S MOTION TO STAY THE COMPLAINT OF WALTER OIL & GAS CORPORATION PENDING ARBITRATION, AND PARTIALLY GRANTING AND PARTIALLY DENYING SKAUGEN PETROTRANS, INC.’S MOTION TO STAY THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

KENT, District Judge.

Plaintiff Walter Oil & Gas Corporation (‘Walter”) brings this action against Tee-kay Shipping, in personam (“Teekay”) 1 , and the M/V ORKNEY SPIRIT, in rem (“Vessel”) 2 (hereinafter,…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Time, Inc. v. Frank ManningCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nam v. Tex Net IncDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2021
  2. Nam v. Tex Net IncDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API