Legal Opinion
Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior v. Battle Mountain Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 28, 1967No. 21259PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge:
Battle Mountain Company initiated these proceedings to secure review of an administrative decision of the Secretary of the Interior rejecting the right of Battle Mountain to the selection of public lands in lieu of forest lands relinquished to the United States by Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Company in 1908. Battle Mountain claimed its forest lieu selection right through 1915 assignments from Santa Fe. The administrative decision rejecting its claim was pursuant to the position of the Secretary that such rights are not assignable and, as to Battle Mountain, had been…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Power Reactor Development Co. v. International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Gray v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Universal Battery Co. v. United States and Four Other CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State of Oregon, by and Through the Division of State Lands v. The Bureau of Land Management, Department of the Interior, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Jay v. DollarhideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Masayesva v. ZahCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Santa Fe Pacific Railroad Company v. CordCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Bogart v. Phase II Pasta MacHines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.