Legal Opinion
Carr v. Stockton
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided July 1, 1922PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWest, J.
This is an action of contract. Upon a trial of the issues there was a directed verdict for plaintiff. Judgment was entered on the ver.dict and defendants took writ of error.
The first and second assignments of error are abandoned.
The third assignment as amended presents for review the ruling of the court sustaining the demurrer to the first plea to the amended declaration.
The plaintiff sues as the Receiver of the Southern Naval Stores Company.
*71The contract sued upon contains a provision that in consideration of the release of Carr Brothers, the defendants, from an existing contract between…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anvil Mining Co. v. HumbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Barrie v. QuinbyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Curtis v. GibneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1882
- Etheredge v. BarkleySupreme Court of Florida · 1889
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. KnoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nat. Merchandise Co., Inc. v. United Serv. Auto. Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Livingston v. MaleverSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
- Ocean Ridge Develop. Corp. v. Quality Plastering, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
- Robberson Steel Co. v. HarrellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1949
- FRED S. CONARD CONSTRUCTION CO. v. Exchange Bank of St. AugustineDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.