Legal Opinion
Brown v. Minnesota Department of Public Welfare
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 1985No. C9-84-295PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
On February 17,1982, the Department of Public Welfare (Department) informed Dr. Hector Brown that he had been erroneously paid $14,673.11 on claims he submitted under the Minnesota Medical Assistance Program. The letter demanded repayment of the money and informed Dr. Brown of his right to demand a contested case hearing on the matter. Dr. Brown requested a contested case hearing. On January 7, 1983, the hearing examiner issued his report, recommending that Dr. Brown be required to repay the Department. The Commissioner adopted the findings of the hearing examiner…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Northern Petrochemical Co. v. United States Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Ridgewood Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Mesaba Aviation Division of Halvorson of Duluth, Inc. v. County of ItascaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Contested Case of Brown v. Minnesota Department of Public WelfareCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by26 opinions
- City of North Oaks v. SarpalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Care Institute, Inc.-Roseville v. County of RamseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Plymouth Foam Products, Inc. v. City of Becker, MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- In re the Amended Administrative Penalty Order to Westling Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Contested Cases of Rem-Canby, Inc. v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.