Poe v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the CourtHawkins, J.
Conviction is for manufacturing whisky; punishment being two.years in the penitentiary.
No question was raised in the lower court relative to the presentment of the' indictment, but appellant now attempts to raise on appeal a complaint that the record fails to show that the indictment was presented by a grand jury in open court. He refers us to Hardy v. State, 1 Tex. App. 556; English v. State (Tex. App.) 18 S. W. 678; Hollingsworth v. State, 87 Tex. Cr. R. 399, 221 S. W 978; Hickox v. State, 95 Tex. Cr. R. 173, 253 S. W 823., All of these cases show that the question was presented in limine…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hickox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
- Hollingsworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
- Rowlett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
- Rather v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888
- Murphey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hullum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945
- Pruitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Hullum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.