Legal Opinion

Poe v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 8, 1924No. 8258PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHawkins, J.

Conviction is for manufacturing whisky; punishment being two.years in the penitentiary.

No question was raised in the lower court relative to the presentment of the' indictment, but appellant now attempts to raise on appeal a complaint that the record fails to show that the indictment was presented by a grand jury in open court. He refers us to Hardy v. State, 1 Tex. App. 556; English v. State (Tex. App.) 18 S. W. 678; Hollingsworth v. State, 87 Tex. Cr. R. 399, 221 S. W 978; Hickox v. State, 95 Tex. Cr. R. 173, 253 S. W 823., All of these cases show that the question was presented in limine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickox v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  2. Hollingsworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Rowlett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1887
  4. Rather v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1888
  5. Murphey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1891

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hullum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
  3. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945
  4. Pruitt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
  5. Hullum v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API