Legal Opinion

People v. Ligon

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 2010No. 108855 RelPublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thomas

Chief Justice Kilbride and Justices Freeman, Gar-man, Karmeier, Burke, and Theis concurred in the judgment and opinion.

OPINION

At issue is whether the federal constitution requires appointment of counsel for indigent postconviction petitioners at the summary dismissal stage whenever the appellate court on direct review has declined to address an ineffective assistance of counsel claim because the facts needed to adjudicate the claim are dehors the record and thus cannot be resolved on direct review. For the reasons that follow, we hold that the constitution does not require the appointment of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Douglas v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Massaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  4. Ross v. MoffittSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. People v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1998

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. People v. EnglishIllinois Supreme Court · 2013
  2. People v. VeachIllinois Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. SnowAppellate Court of Illinois · 2012
  4. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2019
  5. People v. LigonIllinois Supreme Court · 2016

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API