Legal Opinion
Dalrymple v. Grand River Dam Authority
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided May 28, 1998No. 96-5113 to 96-5115PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, Grand River Dam Authority (the “Authority”), is a conservation and reclamation district created pursuant to Oklahoma statute “for the purpose of utilizing the waters of Grand River and its tributaries.” Grand River Dam Auth. v. Wyandotte Bd. of Educ., 193 Okla. 551, 147 P.2d 1003, 1004 (1943) (citing Okla. Stat. tit. 82, § 861(1941)), cert. denied, 322 U.S. 733, 64 S.Ct. 1045, 88 L.Ed. 1568 (1944); Teague v. Grand River Dam Auth., 425 F.2d 130, 132 (10th Cir.1970). Acting as a state agency, the Authority owns and operates the Pensacola Hydroelectric…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Thermtron Products, Inc. v. HermansdorferSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Things Remembered, Inc. v. PetrarcaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mesa v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- City of Albuquerque v. Soto Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Albingia Versicherungs A.G., a Foreign Corporation Siemens Components Pte. Ltd., a Foreign Corporation v. Schenker International Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Barker v. State Insurance FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Banco De Santander Central Hispano, S.A. v. Consalvi International Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- Maggio Enterprises, Inc. v. Hartford Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2001
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.