Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Fidelity Abstract & Title Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1921No. 16062PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Yakima county, Taylor, J., entered November 4, 1919, upon findings in favor of plaintiff, in an action on contract, tried to the court.

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

— This is an action for damages claimed by the plaintiff, Murphy, as a result of an untrue statement negligently made by the defendant abstract company in an abstract of title prepared by it for him, that an irrigation assessment lien upon a tract of land in Yakima county was paid, upon which land he had a mortgage. A trial upon the merits in the superior court for that county, sitting without a jury, resulted in findings and judgment in favor of the plaintiff, from which the defendant has appealed to this court.

The facts of the case are not in dispute, except as to the question of the amount…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Curtley v. Security Savings SocietyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Equitable Building & Loan Ass'n v. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Anderson v. SpriestersbachWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Young v. LohrSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  5. Bremerton Development Co. v. Title Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Ultramares Corp. v. ToucheNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
  2. Glanzer v. . ShepardNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  3. Williams v. PolgarMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  4. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  5. United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of WacoTexas Supreme Court · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API