Legal Opinion

Beagle v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided February 16, 1940No. 21125PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

.BOWEN, District Judge.

This is a law action, commenced in the state court and removed here, to recover damages for personal injuries for negligence, in which defendant pleaded among other things a release, and plaintiff replied that the release was procured by fraud. Defendant moves to have the issue of fraudulent release tried by the court without a jury as in equity separately from and before the other .issues at law are tried.

In the practice under the Code pleading of this state, it has long been approved procedure for plaintiff in this kind of a law action to allege by reply that the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Sanford v. Royal InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Mattson v. Eureka Cedar Lumber & Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Bjorklund v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Hill v. Northern Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Washington · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ettelson v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  2. Occidental Life Ins. Co. of California v. KielhornDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1951
  3. Tague v. Delaware, L. & W. R.District Court, E.D. New York · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API