Legal Opinion

Wiedemann v. Cunard Line Limited

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided August 21, 1978No. 77-907PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Plaintiff, Joseph R. Wiedemann, appeals from the order of the circuit court of Cook County which granted the motion of defendant, Cunard Line Limited (Cunard), to quash the service of summons and dismiss the complaint against it. Plaintiff contends that defendant is subject to in personam jurisdiction of the Illinois courts because it has employees and agents in Illinois, advertises in Illinois and contracted with plaintiff in Illinois.

Plaintiff’s complaint seeks damages for personal injuries he suffered while using the ocean beach at the Hotel LaToc, located on the island of St. Lucia, West…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Gray v. American Radiator & Standard Sanitary Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Nelson v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Rozny v. MarnulIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Mieher v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Mergenthaler Linotype Co. v. Leonard Storch Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Kutner v. DeMassaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Southern Electrical Supply Co. v. Raleigh County National BankWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Stein v. Rio Parismina LodgeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Liaquat Khan v. Van Remmen, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API