Legal Opinion

Hawkins v. Cintas Corporation

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 27, 2024No. 1:19-cv-01062Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION RAYMOND HAWKINS, et al., : Case No. 1:19-cv-1062 : Plaintiffs, : : vs. : : Judge Jeffery P. Hopkins CINTAS CORPORATION, et al., : : Defendants. : : OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiffs Raymond Hawkins, Robin Lung, Needy Krisina Bajao-Wirtjes, Racheal Lovell Neely, Sommer Moore, Adam Dipzinski, Jonathan Wilson, Ismael Atayde-Gonzales, Carlos Cano, Carola Spurlock, Leigha Ayres, and Alvaro Cruzado, hereinafter referred to collectively as “Plaintiffs,” seek to have this lawsuit certified as a class action. Defendants Cintas…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace, & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Williams v. VukovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. In re Cardizem CD Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API