Legal Opinion

Luoyang Bearing Corp.(Group) v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided January 21, 2005No. Consol. 01-00036PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TSOUCALAS, Senior Judge.

I. Standard of Review

The Court will uphold Commerce’s redetermination pursuant to the Court’s remand unless it is “unsupported by substantial evidence on the record, or otherwise not in accordance with law.” 19 U.S.C. § 1516a(b)(l)(B)(i) (2000). Substantial evidence is “more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951) (quoting Consolidated Edison Co. v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229, 59 S.Ct. 206, 83…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. NTN Bearing Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. Professional Drivers Council, John Torbet, and David Gaibis v. Bureau of Motor Carrier Safety, and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  2. Jacobi Carbons AB v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
  3. Zhejiang MacHinery Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API