Legal Opinion

Snowden v. McDaniel

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 1842PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Carroll Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court, delivered by.

Scott, Judge..

McDaniel sued Snowden by petition in debt on- a bond; judgment was rendered against Snowrden,andhe has brought the cause here by appeal. One of the errors assigned, is, that the court overruled the plea of non est factum, filed by Snowden. It has been repeatedly held, that the plea of non est factum, although not verified by affidavit, is a good plea to an action on a sealed instrument;, the omission of tihe affidavit, merely relieves the plaintiff from, the necessity of ... . ... , , proving the execution ot the instrument; all other advan-a…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Zervis v. UnnerstallMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Medlin v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1845
  3. Shuttleworth v. DunlopNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1881

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API