Legal Opinion

Siembab v. Siembab

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 22, 1954PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPiper, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Helen K. Siembab, from an order of the Oneida Special Term denying her motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The action was brought by the three-year-old son of the defendants, by his guardian ad litem, to recover damages sustained by the infant who was seriously injured in an accident when an automobile owned by his father and being driven by his mother, defendant-appellant, ran off the southerly side of York Street, near Sophia Street in the city of Utica, striking a hydrant…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cannon v. CannonNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  2. Sorrentino v. SorrentinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Ciani v. CianiNew York Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Epstein v. EpsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Badigian v. BadigianNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  2. Rutkowski v. WaskoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. Henderson v. HendersonNew York Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Allstate Insurance v. Reliance InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Decker v. DeckerNew York Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API