Legal Opinion

Sabin v. Lebenbaum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Multnomah: Loyal B. Stearns, Judge. This is a suit by judgment creditors of the defendant Lebenbaum,—lately a merchant doing business in Portland,—to set aside a certain chattel mortgage executed by Lebenbaum to his codefendant Silvestone on the eighth day of August, eighteen hundred and ninety-two, to secure the payment of five hundred and twenty-six dollars, and also a general assignment to the defendant Watson, made by Lebenbaum on the second day of September,…

Read the full summary

Appeal from Multnomah: Loyal B. Stearns, Judge. This is a suit by judgment creditors of the defendant Lebenbaum,—lately a merchant doing business in Portland,—to set aside a certain chattel mortgage executed by Lebenbaum to his codefendant Silvestone on the eighth day of August, eighteen hundred and ninety-two, to secure the payment of five hundred and twenty-six dollars, and also a general assignment to the defendant Watson, made by Lebenbaum on the second day of September, eighteen hundred and ninety-two, for the benefit of all his creditors. The facts, which are substantially undisputed,…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Bean.

*4231. The' main issue in this case is the validity of the general assignment to Watson. As a preliminary question, however, the right of the assignee, who is made a party to the suit, to appear and defend, is challenged because he has not given a bond or filed an inventory of the estate as required by law. This objection is without merit. No. such question is made by the pleadings: on the contrary, the complaint alleges the assignment to Watson; that he accepted the trust, and made a demand on the sheriff for the possession of the attached property, but that at…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Turner v. . JaycoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
  2. Platt v. . LottNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Batten v. SmithWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Emigrant Industrial Sav'gs B'k v. . RocheNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
  5. Meeker v. SandersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Neuberger v. BoyceOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Snyder v. MurdockUtah Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API