Turner v. . Jaycox
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from judgment of the General Term in the seventh district, affirming judgment below for the plaintiff. The opinion of the court sufficiently states the facts.
1Opinion of the CourtDaniels, J.
This action was brought to recover the value of goods and merchandise seized under an attachment and afterwards sold upon execution, in an action brought by the defendants, as creditors, of the firm of hi. Pulver & Co., which had previously been engaged in' business at Palmyra, in Wayne county. The firm became insolvent, and on the 4th day of April, 1861, they made and delivered a general assignment to the plaintiff, for the benefit of their creditors. The property in controversy was attached on the 20th day of April, 1861. Judgment was recovered in the action in which the seizure was made on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Platt v. . LottNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
- Hurlbert v. DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Williams v. . ShellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1867
3Cited by27 opinions
- Bock v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Crook v. . RindskopfNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Berkshire Woolen Company v. . JuillardNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
- Holmes v. . HubbardNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- Second National Bank v. . BurtNew York Court of Appeals · 1883
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.