Gloyd v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING in Prohibition to prevent the entry of a final decree of divorce. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
Prohibition. This matter is presented for decision upon the petition filed and the answer thereto of the respondent. The facts as we shall state them are admitted.
On the twenty-seventh day of February, 1918, in the superior court of Los Angeles County, in an action wherein Albert M. Gloyd was plaintiff and the petitioner Maiette S. Gloyd was defendant, an interlocutory decree was entered adjudging that the plaintiff was entitled to a divorce from the defendant, “and that when one year shall have expired, after the entry of this interlocutory judgment, a final judgment and decree shall be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Olson v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- In Re Estate of DargieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Kirschner v. DietrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- In Re Estate of SeilerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Borg v. BorgCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Estate of HughesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- Walton v. WaltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
- Lane v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- McClenny v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.