People v. Taylor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress statements he made to law enforcement officials. The Supreme Court properly found that the defendant’s initial statements to police officers when they first encountered him, and after he and his brother *1134followed the officers back to their car, were admissible since the defendant was not then in custody. The record reveals that the defendant would reasonably have believed that he was free to leave the presence of the police at those times (see People v Brown, 295 AD2d 442, 443 [2002]). The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. LynesNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- People v. MackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. AnthonyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. HarrisNew York Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.