Legal Opinion

Ulinski v. Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, Local 56

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided November 24, 2020No. 2:19-cv-03627Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK PAUL E. ULINSKI, Plaintiff, v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BROTHERHOOD OF RAILROAD SIGNALMEN 19-CV-3627 (LDH) (CLP) LOCAL 56, Defendant. LASHANN DEARCY HALL, United States District Judge: Plaintiff Paul E. Ulinski, proceeding pro se, brings the instant action against Defendant the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen Local 56 ( “Local 56”) pursuant to the Labor Management Relations Act (the “LMRA”),

29 U.S.C. §§ 141

et seq.; the National Labor Relations Act (the “NLRA”),

29 U.S.C. §§ 151

et seq.; the National Apprenticeship Act (the “NAA”),

29 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Ben Gary Triestman v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  4. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API