Legal Opinion

State v. Mercado

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided November 29, 1974No. 19915PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Littlejohn, Justice:

Francisco Cancel Mercado, the appellent, was indicted for murder and grand larceny. A jury acquitted him of murder and found him guilty of grand larceny. He has appealed.

Appellant argues that he should be given a new trial on the grounds that the verdicts of the jury were unreasonably inconsistent, that it was prejudicial error for the trial court to allow a censored letter to be used for cross-examination, and that the trial judge abused his discretion in setting the sentence. We disagree.

These charges arose after Mr. J. D. Fielding was found dead in his home. His hands…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Harris v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Walder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Palmigiano v. TravisonoDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. AlexanderSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. GoodmonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. EckhartSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  4. State v. ArroyoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  5. State v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API