Legal Opinion

Wright v. Oklahoma Department of Transportation

District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Decided May 19, 2020No. 5:20-cv-00443Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA STEPHEN CHRISTOPER WRIGHT, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-20-443-D ) OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF ) TRANSPORTATION, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER Upon examination of Plaintiff’s Complaint [Doc. No. 1], the Court finds that it fails to show subject matter jurisdiction and to satisfy the pleading requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a).1 Further, because Plaintiff is proceeding under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the Complaint is subject to dismissal pursuant to § 1915(e)(2)(B). Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure requires that a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API