Legal Opinion

Morrell v. Towle

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1942No. 31306PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This is an action brought on March 24, 1933, to recover the amount alleged to be due for rent accrued under a 99-year lease on certain property in the city of Omaha. Thereafter in April, 1933, the defendant Towle brought an action as plaintiff under the declaratory judgment act against the lessor, Morrell, resulting in the judgment of this court on July 9, 1935, holding that an assignment of a part of the leasehold was valid and that Towle was not liable for rents accruing on such part of the leasehold estate for the unexpired term of the lease. See Towle v. Morrell, 129 Neb. 398, 261 N. W.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Blochowitz v. BlochowitzNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
  2. Hanson v. HansonNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Wheeler v. BradyNebraska Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Bliss v. Live Stock National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Witzenburg v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Niklaus v. PHOENIX INDEMNITY COMPANY OF NEW YORKNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Nelson v. NelsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Baton v. Gulf Oil Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
  5. Wischmann v. RaikesNebraska Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API