Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Askari Abdullah Muhammad v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 23, 2013No. 12-16243Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWilson, Circuit Judge

I concur with the majority’s opinion insofar as it holds that the application of the “cold, calculated, and premeditated” statutory aggravating factor in this case does not violate the ex post facto clause of the United States Constitution. U.S. Const, art. I, § 9. Relying upon clear precedent, the Florida Supreme Court determined that, although this aggravating factor was enacted after Muhammad committed the Gans murders, its application did not add anything new to the elements of the crimes for which he was convicted and did not disadvantage him. Knight v. State, 746 So.2d 423, 434…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API