Legal Opinion

McAllister v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals Board

California Supreme Court

Decided October 4, 1968No. S. F. 22601Published

1Opinion of the Court

69 Cal.2d 408 (1968)

MYRTLE McALLISTER, Petitioner,

v.

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD and CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Respondents.

Supreme Court of California.

Oct. 4, 1968.

Tormey, Cotchett & Lev, Tormey & Cotchett and Joseph W. Cotchett for Petitioner.

Werchick & Werchick and Arne Werchick as Amici Curiae on behalf of Petitioner.

Everett A. Corten, Marcel L. Gunther, Thomas M. O'Connor, City Attorney, and Raymond E. Agosti, Deputy City Attorney, for Respondents.

TOBRINER, J.

Petitioner seeks review of the appeals board's decision after reconsideration in which the board held that the…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. McAllister v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Pacific Employers Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Cantrell v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Employers Mutual Liability Insurance Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Independence Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API