Peacock v. Shinn
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
Plaintiff Edwin B. Peacock, Jr., (“plaintiff’), a resident and taxpayer of the City of Charlotte, North Carolina, brought this action as a public interest taxpayer action for the benefit of all citizens and taxpayers of Charlotte. Briefly summarized, plaintiff alleges as follows:
In 1985, the City of Charlotte issued general obligation bonds to finance the construction of the Charlotte Coliseum. During the period beginning in March 1987 through December 1991, various agreements were entered into between the Auditorium-Coliseum-Convention Center Authority (the “Authority”) for the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- Energy Investors Fund, L.P. v. Metric Constructors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2000
- Briggs v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
- Town of Emerald Isle Ex Rel. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
- Adams v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Charlotte Motor Speedway, LLC v. County of CabarrusCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
- Creek Pointe Homeowner's Ass'n v. HappCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Munger v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Pinney v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Reese v. Mecklenburg CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.