Legal Opinion

United States v. Householder

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided November 7, 1985No. ACM S26807Published

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

HODGSON, Chief Judge:

The single issue before us may be stated thus: Does the off-base forgery of a servicemember’s signature by another service-member have sufficient “service-connection” to give the military jurisdiction over the offense? The appellant, citing O’Callahan v. Parker, 395 U.S. 258, 89 S.Ct. 1683, 23 L.Ed.2d 291 (1969), Relford v. Commandant, 401 U.S. 355, 91 S.Ct. 649, 28 L.Ed.2d 102 (1971) and United States v. Uhlman, 1 M.J. 419 (C.M.A.1976), argues that it does not and asks that we set aside his conviction as to these three allegations.1 We find an adequate basis for…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LockwoodUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. UhlmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. BenedictU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API