Legal Opinion

People v. Romero

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 1, 1998PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Titone, J.

A jury convicted defendant of the crimes of the unlawful practice of law and petit larceny. The question in this case is whether the Attorney-General had the authority under Judiciary Law § 476-a (1) to prosecute defendant for these crimes. Although section 476-a (1) directly authorizes the Attorney-General to bring an “action” against those whom he believes are engaged in the unlawful practice of law, we conclude, based on the language and legislative history of sections 476-a and 476-b, that the word “action” in the statute refers only to a civil action.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. GoodfriendNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People Ex Rel. Bennett v. LamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Della Pietra v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. El Gemayel v. SeamanNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  5. New York Criminal & Civil Courts Bar Ass'n v. JacobyNew York Court of Appeals · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. SparberNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. People v. ConcepcionNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. People v. LaFontaineNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. People v. GilmourNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Romero v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API