Hollar v. Richard Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner’s representative disqualifying relator from receiving unemployment compensation benefits for voluntarily quitting her job. The representative’s decision modified a referee’s finding that she had been terminated for misconduct. We affirm.
FACTS
Relator Hollar was employed as a machine operator beginning in April, 1983. The employer’s policy required that machine operators be available to work an hour of overtime upon notification by the employer. Hollar denies that she was notified of the policy prior to beginning work…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- Hendrickson v. Northfield CleanersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sandstrom v. Douglas MacHine Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Midland Electric, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Gonsior v. Alternative Staffing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- County Market v. DahlenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Christenson v. City of Albert LeaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.