Legal Opinion

Hollar v. Richard Manufacturing Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 17, 1984No. C6-83-1880PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Commissioner’s representative disqualifying relator from receiving unemployment compensation benefits for voluntarily quitting her job. The representative’s decision modified a referee’s finding that she had been terminated for misconduct. We affirm.

FACTS

Relator Hollar was employed as a machine operator beginning in April, 1983. The employer’s policy required that machine operators be available to work an hour of overtime upon notification by the employer. Hollar denies that she was notified of the policy prior to beginning work…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Zepp v. Arthur Treacher Fish & Chips, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Hendrickson v. Northfield CleanersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. Douglas MacHine Corp.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Midland Electric, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  3. Gonsior v. Alternative Staffing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. County Market v. DahlenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  5. Christenson v. City of Albert LeaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API