Legal Opinion

State v. Lamar

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1997No. 49A02-9603-CR-128PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STATON, Judge.

The State of Indiana brings this appeal pursuant to Indiana Code § 35-38-4-2(5) (1993) contesting the trial court’s grant of Jimmie R. Lamar’s motion to suppress illegally seized evidence. The State raises the sole issue of whether the trial court erred in granting the motion to suppress.

We reverse and remand.

On June 14, 1995, Detective Kimberly Travis was working undercover posing as a prostitute. Lamar drove alongside Detective Travis and asked her “How much?” Detective Travis held up two fingers to indicate *542twenty dollars. Upon approaching Lamar’s automobile, Detective…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Peterson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burkett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  2. Turner v. Sheriff of Marion CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 2000
  3. Justice v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  4. Wilson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Edmond v. GoldsmithDistrict Court, S.D. Indiana · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API