Legal Opinion

Edmond v. Goldsmith

District Court, S.D. Indiana

Decided November 18, 1998No. IP 98-1400-C-B/SPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENTRY GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

BARKER, Chief Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction in which Plaintiffs seek to enjoin Defendants from conducting drug interdiction checkpoints, and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification. While we GRANT Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification, we must DENY Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction because the City of Indianapolis’ use of drug interdiction checkpoints does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API