Legal Opinion

Arnold v. General Motors Corp.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 1978No. Docket 77-2628PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, C. J.

Plaintiff appeals by leave from a June 10, 1977, order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board affirming the decision of the referee denying compensation benefits. Plaintiff, on appeal, argues that the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board did not adequately set forth the testimony it adopted, or the standard and reasoning it used in reaching its conclusion that plaintiffs obstructive lung disease did not arise out of or in the course of his employment. Plaintiff also contends that there was no evidence from which the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board could conclude that plaintiff did not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. DeGeer v. DeGeer Farm Equipment Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Deziel v. Difco Laboratories. Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Leskinen v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Frammolino v. Richmond Products Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Lamb v. John's TavernMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nunn v. GA CANTRICK CO., INC.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Gibbs v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Cooper v. Chrysler Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Chilcote v. Cadillac Malleable Iron Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API