Legal Opinion

Myers v. Lawson Milk Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1968No. 40977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerbert, J.

The principal question presented here is whether it was prejudicial error for the trial court to give the following requested special instruction to the jury, over plaintiff’s objection, prior to argument:

“If you find from your — the evidence that both the Lawson Milk Company and Judith Myers were negligent in the operation of their respective vehicles and that the negligence of each proximately contributed to some extent to cause the accident which occurred, your verdict must be for the defendant without respect to the degree or amount of negligence of either.” (Emphasis added.)

We considered…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bradley v. Mansfield Rapid Transit, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Bahm v. Pittsburgh & Lake Erie Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Bartson v. CraigOhio Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wren v. SteigerOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Rohde v. FarmerOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Suchy v. MooreOhio Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API