Legal Opinion

Farmers' High Line & Reservoir Co. v. Wolf

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 1913No. 3444PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from Denver- District Court. IIon. George W. Allen, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

John Wolff and Miers Fisher presented their joint petition under the provisions of the statute (session laws of 1903, p. 278 et seq., Rev. Stats, of 1908, sec. 3226 et seq.) praying for a decree permitting a change in the point of diversion of certain adjudicated water rights in water district No. 7, to-wit: seven second-feet of decreed priority No. 11, from the headgate of the Kershaw ditch, and five second-feet of decreed priority No. 16, from the headgate of the Fisher ditch, to the headgate of the Rocky Mountain ditch.. It was alleged that The Kershaw Ditch Company, a corporation, was the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Farmers' High Line Canal & Reservoir Co. v. SouthworthSupreme Court of Colorado · 1889
  2. Fort Lyon Canal Co. v. ChewSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. New Cache la Poudre Irrigation Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1902
  4. Louden Irrigating Canal Co. v. Handy Ditch Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1896
  5. Wadsworth Ditch Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Colorado · 1907

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Washington State Sugar Co. v. GoodrichIdaho Supreme Court · 1915
  2. City of Colorado Springs v. YustSupreme Court of Colorado · 1952
  3. Hallenbeck v. Granby Ditch and Reservoir CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1966
  4. Crockett v. JonesIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. New Cache la Poudre Irrigating Co. v. Water Supply & Storage Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1923

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API