Legal Opinion

Minneapolis-Moline Co. v. Massey-Harris Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided September 30, 1952No. Civ. A. No. 3541PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

JOYCE, District Judge.

This is an action for infringement of Ronning et al. Patent No. 2,455,905, issued December 7, 1948 to • Minneapolis-Moline Power Implement Company upon an application filed by Martin Ronning and Kenneth M. Keith. Plaintiff is the owner of said patent by virtue of assignment from Ronning and Keith and a subsequent assignment and merger in which it was the surviving corporation. The defenses asserted are noninfringement, anticipation, lack of invention, and that the alleged invention was not in fact a joint invention.

The patent in suit is embodied in a grain combine of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Trico Products Corporation v. Delman Corporation Delman Corporation v. Trico Products CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  3. General Bronze Corp. v. Cupples Products Corp. (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1951
  4. Alemite Co. v. Jiffy Lubricator Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  5. General Motors Corporation v. KeslingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1947

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kawneer Co. v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API