Legal Opinion

DeAngelis v. Scott

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 10, 1972No. Civ. A. 86-71 EriePublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WEBER, District Judge.

This is an action of interpleader. A Pennsylvania employer and his workmen’s compensation insurance carrier have paid into court the proceeds of an award made under the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation law [77 P.S. § 1 et seq.] and have impleaded the claimant, DeAngelis, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts to assert their claims. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts demands the fund because of assignment of the claim to it made by the claimant in Massachusetts, valid under Massachusetts statutes. The claimant demands the fund because the Pennsylvania Workmen’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Babcock v. JacksonNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  5. Neville Chemical Company v. Union Carbide CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. DuSesoi v. United Refining Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Ifert v. MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API