Legal Opinion
Chelsea Exchange Bank v. Warner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 14, 1922PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Page, J.:
The action was brought on a promissory note which was prepared by taking a blank collateral security note of the Chelsea Exchange Bank and striking out the name of the bank and writing above it the name of George Coffing Warner or order and by striking out in different places in the blank the word “ bank ” and writing over it the word “ payee.” There were several blanks which were not filled in. The first two are as follows: “ On - for value received the undersigned hereby promises to pay to George Coffing Warner or order $20,000.00/100 with interest at the rate of—% per annum.” The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Canajoharie National Bank v. DiefendorfNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Pardee v. . KanadyNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
- Higgins v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
- Keister v. WadeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
3Cited by12 opinions
- Enoch v. BrandonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In Re International Raw Material CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
- Steward v. Atlantic Nat. Bank of BostonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
- Old Colony Trust Co. v. StumpelNew York Supreme Court · 1926
- George A. Unsinn and Margaret Unsinn v. Leslie R. Wilson and Mary K. WilsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.