Legal Opinion

Coronado v. Orona

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 15, 2007No. 25014-8-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶1 Washington contractors cannot sue clients to recover compensation or for breach of contract if the contractors are not properly registered. RCW 18.27.080. One exception to this rule is applicable if the contractor has merely sold or installed a finished product or material that does not become a permanent, fixed part of a structure. RCW 18.27.090(5).

Schultheis, J. —

¶2 Adolfo Coronado, doing business as Royal Landscaping & Gardening Company, contracted with Patty Orona and her boyfriend, Leslie Rucker (hereafter Ms. Orona) to landscape around the couple’s newly-built home in Yakima. Mr.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marquis v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Cerrillo v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Cerrillo v. EsparzaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Owen v. Burlington Northern and Santa Fe RR Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Owen v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 2005

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. BUILDING INDUSTRY ASS'N v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  2. Building Industry Ass'n v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  3. Blue Diamond Group, Inc. v. KB Seattle 1, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2011
  4. Rahman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
  5. Rahman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API