Legal Opinion

Ada Milling Co. v. George

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 16, 1934No. 22859PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The only question presented by this appeal is whether or not the trial court had jurisdiction to allow an amendment to the return of summons after judgment was had and motion for new trial had been overruled.

Alonzo George, as plaintiff, brought suit to recover damages on account of Johnson grass being mixed in certain oats purchased from the defendant, a corporation.

The case was submitted to a jury and verdict given for plaintiff, and jridgment entered accordingly. Motion for new trial was presented and overruled. The defendant gave notice in open court of its intention to appeal and was by…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De Vitt v. City of El RenoSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. Hutchings v. WinsorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Dill v. MarksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Potter v. ChecoteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Krause v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Ryan v. PlathWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Parker v. HardySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Dawson v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of MarylandDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 1961
  5. Short v. HaleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API