Earl Van Blaricom v. Donald Forscht, as United States Marshal
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellant Earl Van Blaricom filed for habeas corpus relief in United States District Court on November 9, 1971 contesting the validity of the revocation of his parole as a federal prisoner. The district court denied Van Blaricom’s petition by an order entered December 20, 1971. On February 21, 1973, a panel of this Court reversed and remanded to the district court to grant either appellant’s petition for habeas corpus or to allow respondents a reasonable time to afford appellant a new revocation hearing meeting applicable federal statutory and administrative requirements discussed in the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Cudahy Packing Co. v. HollandSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Federal Trade Commission v. Flotill Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Johnson v. LairdCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Ray Earnest v. R. I. Moseley, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- John L. Broadway v. City of Montgomery, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- In Re Ben Jean Prevot and Arielle Dominique Prevot, the Minor Children. Jean-Claude Prevot v. Debra Moseman PrevotCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. George SnowCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Neal Ruetz v. Russell E. Lash, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Maria Guadalupe DevalleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.