Legal Opinion

Clark v. County of Beadle

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1919No. File No. 4316PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Respondents cited): Horrabin v. Iowa City (la.), 130 N. W. 150; S. C., 142 N. W. 212.

1Opinion of the CourtGateis, J.

On rehearing of 169 N. W. 23. The dissenting opinion upon the- former hearing of the motion to -dismiss the appeal, and respondents’ brief upon the rehearing, rest upon the following partially italicized portion of such dissenting opinion, viz.:.

“Any judgment this court might now render would toe ineffectual for any purpose, ■ since the right to injunctive relief — the only relief sought and the only relief which would ever have been possible under any view of the pleadings — has now ceased to exist”

The relief sought by the complaint was based upon the alleged noncompliance with certain…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Clarke v. County of BeadleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Save Centennial Valley Ass'n, Inc. v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
  2. City of Plankinton v. KiefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Campbell v. FritzscheSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Maxwell v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Clark v. County of BeadleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API