Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Donelson

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided March 24, 1931No. 6680, 6680-APublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Litz, President:

This writ involves the trial of the right of property upon the petitions of intervenors in an attachment proceeding.

On October 30, 1925, C. F. Cunningham and O. L. Hel-mick, trading as Motor Service Company, instituted an action in assumpsit against S. F. Donelson, J. F. Winbigler and J. A. Rice, partners under the firm name of Donelson, Win-bigler & Rice, for the recovery of $844.58 on open account. On the same day an order of attachment was issued in the action (on the ground of non-residence of Donelson and Win-bigler) and levied upon certain road constructing equipment, as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Andrews v. MundyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Goodman v. HenryWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Carroll v. NisbetSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Ashland Finance Co. v. DudleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Cunningham v. DonelsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. NussSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  2. Metro Plan, Inc. v. Kotcher-Turner, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Mosko v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1947
  4. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. TrusslerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. M. A. C. Credit Corp. v. GoodrichCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API